ใจเย็นท่านเต่าคงกำลังเทสผลให้ดูอ่ะนะ ผมก็อยากรู้ด้วยเหมือนกันครับ....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GTX 690 กับ GTX TITan
Collapse
X
-
เอา soft mod มาให้ผมก็ได้เดี๋ยวเทสให้ผมเองก็อยากลองเหมือนกันครับ
อย่ามาถามนะว่าผมมี Titan จริงรึเปล่า (แสดงว่าไม่เคยอ่านกระทู้ club)
This is the eternal question and we as stubborn as we are still trying to get a better deal for less money, nothing wrong with that I am always for pay less but as Alexander mentioned the big difference is in the drivers and internal architecture, that will make any high end Quadro perform better in a CAD or 3D application when they are required, also the components of Quadros are meant to last longer (so they say) and the power consumption is less, low heat also.
Yes gaming card will perform better on real time applications and render faster in with GPU software, but they will use way more energy and generate more heat and at the end heat mean lower life spam, although for the price that you pay it may be worth spend a few hundred from time to time.
I have tested different Quadros and GTX and is always the same result, on 3d MAX in polygon heavy scene, Quadro will perform better, in CAD software, hundred of lines will spin faster with Quadros. Now Sometimes the price difference will make worth that small slow performance but if you are all about performance, you need to pay the price.
As long NVidia make the trick of locked drivers this will repeat with every new release if not there is not business for them right?I've been looking at these two cards, there's a massive difference in price and after looking at the specks it looks like the cheaper Titan is a much better deal. Can someone confirm the Titan is better than the 6000 in virtually every way and is 1/3 the price? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...
ดูเหมือนหลายๆคนในนั้นจะบอกเดี๋ยวนี้ แทบไม่ต่างกันทั้งสาย GF และ quadro แต่ที่ต่างกันจริงๆคือ Driver ครับถ้าเป็นตามนี้จริงถ้าคุณ mod driver ได้ก็ได้การ์ดมาทำงานแล้วแถมมันยัดแรมมาให้อีก 6GB ซึ่งพอใช้แน่ๆLast edited by Khow; 4 Oct 2013, 21:47:45.
Comment

Comment