
AMD Ryzen 4 Core / 8 Thread Raven Ridge First Performance Numbers Leaked ? Comparable Performance To Intel Core i5 6600 In Fritz Chess Benchmark
I have something rather interesting today, what appears to be the first benchmark of the AMD Raven Ridge 4 Core/ 8 Thread configuration as well as an x86 name we rarely hear: VIA, or more accurately in this case, Zhaoxin. The benchmarks in question were actually published on the official Zhaoxin page but have since been removed (not before we got a copy of them though). Since the benchmark is from the company?s official page, there is no reason to doubt the authenticity of this leak.
Zhaoxin rolls out competitive x86 lineup on the 16nm node ? pits them against unreleased AMD Raven Ridge 4 Core 8 Thread APU
This particular leak is actually about the Raven Ridge platform, which is basically a Zen 4 Core / 8 Thread configuration APU with a Vega GPU side. That said, the performance of this chip would be pretty similar to the Ryzen 4C 8T counterpart (at same clocks), so it is a fairly accurate metric to get an estimate from. The benchmark however, isn?t the best choice and represents a very very limited sample size and leaves a lot to be desired. That said, beggars cannot be choosers and without any further ado, here is the exclusive first look at AMD?s Raven Ridge platform (as well as some mighty powerful competitors from Zhaoxin, lets not forget about the impressive underdog!):

The benchmark image is of a very low quality and the color codes are hard to distinguish so I have taken the liberty to transcribe them onto the table below. As you can see, the Raven Ridge counterpart offers performance that (in Fritz Chess benchmark at the very least) is on par with Intel?s Core i5 6600 offering. What is perhaps even more impressive, is that the Zhaoxin ZX-E 8 core processor is well within the same tier of performance (and fabricated at a comparable 16nm FinFET node at that!).
| Intel Core KabyLake i5 7500 | 4 | 4 | 3.4 | 14000 |
| Intel Core Skylake i5 6600 | 4 | 4 | 3.3 | 11333 |
| AMD Zen 4C8T Raven Ridge | 4 | 8 | Unknown | 11000 |
| Zhaoxin ZX-E | 8 | 8 | 3.0 | 10500 |
| AMD FX-8370 | 8 | 8 | 4.0 | 9360 |
| AMD A10-7890 | 4 | 4 | 4.1 | 7943 |
| Zhaoxin ZX-D | 8 | 8 | 2.0 | 7837 |
| Intel Core Skylake i3 6300 | 2 | 4 | 3.8 | 7796 |
| Intel Pentium G4500 | 2 | 2 | 3.5 | 5392 |
| Zhaoxin ZX-D | 4 | 4 | 2.0 | 4316 |
| Zhaoxin ZX-C | 4 | 4 | 2.0 | 3523 |
Let?s also talk a bit about hte Zhaoxin processors in these benchmarks. There are 4 different flavors here, the Zhaoxin ZX-C, ZX-D and ZX-E categories. The ZX-D category is further divided into a 4 core and an 8 core tier. To my knowledge, Zhaoxin processors do not employ any kind of SMT so the core count should be equal to the thread count. As I mentioned however, the company has come a very long way. Their 8-core is now actually offering competitive performance to Intel and AMD counterparts ? which was unheard of in recent past! This is something that can only be good for
Now the current processors are actually a mutual collaboration between Zhaoxin and VIA and are supposed to bring competitive x86 performance to the Chinese market. VIA was granted the x86 license by Intel for a period of 10 years in 2003, during which it could make x86 based processors and sell them. However, while that period expired in 2013, Intel had also included a 3 year grace period during which negotiations to renew the contract could be had. Anyone without a math handicap would notice that this grace period expired in 2016. The current status of the licensing agreement between VIA and Intel is not known but if VIA is helping Zhaoxin roll out x86 processors then either the former has renewed its license or the latter has received a new one from Intel.
Previously, VIA?s (technically, Centaur Technology?s) processors have been at the 28nm process ? but this particular gem is actually based on TSMC?s 16nm FinFET node. It features up to 8 cores on a single die and is probably based on a custom derivative of VIA Isaiah by Zhaoxin. It supports all instruction sets upto AVX 2.0 and should be able to handle just about any modern application you care to throw at it. Its worth mentioning that currently VIA does not list the processor at its website.
** ไม่อยากตั้งชื่อกระทู้ไปเปรียบเทียบกะอีกค่าย เดี๋ยวหาเรื่องทะเลาะกันอีก

VIA CPU !
งดแรงชั่วคราว 

Comment