Tweet
ใครยังคิดว่าทาซิลิโคนแบบไหนก็ได้ ไม่ผิด ไม่มีปัญหาใดๆทั้งสิ้น เอาที่สบายใจจ้า
-
ใครยังคิดว่าทาซิลิโคนแบบไหนก็ได้ ไม่ผิด ไม่มีปัญหาใดๆทั้งสิ้น เอาที่สบายใจจ้า -
-
แต่คลิปนี้ผม งง มากเลยครับ ทำไม tredripper คอร์/เทรดเยอะกว่า 2700X มาก แต่กลับสตรีม Preset ได้แค่ Medium
ได้เท่า 2700X เลยครับ จริงๆมันควรได้ Preset เยอะกว่านั้นไม่ใช่หรอ ผมสงสัยมาจนถึงทุกวันนี้เลยComment
-
Simultaneous Gaming and Streaming
This really isn’t my arena, but I felt it needed to be expressed here so I’ll let AMD do it in their words:
While raw gaming performance is still a common yardstick amongst enthusiasts for performance comparisons, many gamers aspire to even greater heights: streaming their gameplay in high-definition while playing, “Many gamers” is an increasingly astounding figure, too. In the last five years, eSports has grown from a little-known niche corner of the gaming market to a global phenomenon on-track to reach $1 billion in 2019. And the fans are no less enthusiastic, watching 9 billion man hours of content in 2018.
At the heart of this trend lies Twitch, which has helped feed the growth of eSports by serving as a cultural nexus for gamers sharing their gameplay and personalities with loyal fans. But the simplicity of broadcasting to Twitch can come with some steep hardware requirements. According to Twitch customer support, “many broadcasters will find that they get a lot of ‘input lag’ when playing video games.”
“Some games are very CPU-intensive and require a strong computer to run. These games are tough on your processor, especially if you are running the game on the highest settings,” Twitch Support reads.
Broadcasters say the rise of GPU encoding has not done much to address the needs of streamers that expect the best quality for their viewers. Many streamers agree that the relatively tight 3500-6000 Kbps bitrate limits of Twitch, and the short render-to-broadcast window for a smooth stream, put the GPU at a disadvantage. Users often report that GPU encoders need more bitrate to achieve the same quality delivered by a CPU-based x264 encoder preconfigured on streaming packages like QBS and Xsplit. Though GPU encoders are getting better all the time, and work wonders for users on performance-constrained systems, the world’s top streamers still rely on processors or dual systems to give the best result for their fans.
More recent contenders to the streaming space are acknowledging the growing appetite for higher stream quality, and the expanding portfolio of hardware to deliver it. YouTube, for example, recommends up to 9000 Kbps for live 1080p6O streaming.
But bitrate alone does not determine final quality. It Is widely understood that the x264 encoder profile (e.g. Fast, Faster, Slow] has an outsized impact on the resulting encode, as the CPU spends more or less time on scene analysis before spending bitrate budget on the encode. Streamquality.report has been working to address this debate in concrete terms via Netflix machine learning algorithms, which can suss out an exact quality metric by comparing encoded frames to the original. Their results find a bitrate in the range of 7500 Kbps+ with the Slow preset offers the highest quality result on subjective and objective terms with a Netflix VMAF score of 81.9/100—-the best score of any preset they tested.
That brings us to AMD’s own evaluation of gaming and streaming, which we demonstrated privately and publicly using Tom Clancy’s The Division 2, to compare the 12-core AMD Ryzen™ 9 3900X and 8-core Core i9-9900K at approximately the same price. The results were conclusive: the Ryzen 9 3900X can readily handle the higher-quality presets outlined by YouTube and Streamquality.report, while the 9900K could not deliver a smooth stream to viewers. Testing across a range of bitrates and titles showed fewer dropped frames in the 9900K stream quality, but dropped frames appear largely unavoidable without sacrificing the high-quality Slow preset. Altogether, this highlights the benefit of newer and more capable hardware, as such devices can accomplish new workloads that are qualitatively beneficial to the user
That brings us to AMD’s own evaluation of gaming and streaming, which we demonstrated privately and publicly using Tom Clancy’s The Division 2, to compare the 12-core AMD Ryzen™ 9 3900X and 8-core Core i9-9900K at approximately the same price. The results were conclusive: the Ryzen 9 3900X can readily handle the higher-quality presets outlined by YouTube and Streamquality.report, while the 9900K could not deliver a smooth stream to viewers. Testing across a range of bitrates and titles showed fewer dropped frames in the 9900K stream quality, but dropped frames appear largely unavoidable without sacrificing the high-quality Slow preset. Altogether, this highlights the benefit of newer and more capable hardware, as such devices can accomplish new workloads that are qualitatively beneficial to the user
https://www.overclockers.com/amd-ryz...0x-cpu-review/Comment
-
ทาซิลิโคนไม่ทั่วครับ ซีพียูร้อน clock ลดลง เลย stream ได้ไม่ดีครับ (มีสรุปช่วงท้ายคลิป)Originally posted by folkzacup View PostComment
-
-
ประเด็นร้อนต่อจาก ขวด
Comment
-
Comment
-
ทาๆ ไปเถอะนั้นถูกต้องแล้ว เน้นให้ทั่วถึงและเว้นขอบรอบกระดอง CPU ไว้หน่อยนึง เพราะเมื่อซิ้งกดลงไปมันจะพอดีกับขอบ
แต่ถ้าคุณทาพอดีไม่เว้นขอบพอโดนกด มันจะล้นออกมาและอาจตกลงไปบน Socket CPU ได้ เด๋วปัญหาชิบหายวายป่วงตามมาได้อีกโดยใช่เหตุ
ใช้ซิลิโคลนในปริมาณที่พอดีไม่มากไม่น้อย เพราะถ้ามากไปหรือน้อยไป ส่งผลต่ออุณหภูมิที่ได้ทั้งคู่ เน้นทางสายกลาง
Comment
-
-
ทาให้ทั่วก็พอครับ เดี๋ยวนี้กระดองมันใหญ่ ปาด ๆ หน่อยก็โอเค อย่าให้ล้นเป็นใช้ได้Comment
-
ทาๆ ไปเหอะ.. ;pComment
-
-
ผมเคยดูแล้วครับ ตอนที่ยังไม่แก้ มันได้น้อยกว่านี้ครับ พอแก้แล้วทาซิลิโคนหายร้อนแล้ว สรุปมันก็ยังทำได้ขึ้นมาแค่ medium เท่า 2700x อยู่ดีครับท่านOriginally posted by Hirasawa View PostComment
-
Comment
Comment