BFBC2 ทำไมเข้าเกมส์ช้ากว่าคนอื่น

[sambaycup]

ไม่ทราบว่าทำไม เวลาผมโหลด map เข้าเกมส์ผมจะโหลดเข้าเกมส์ช้ากว่า คนอื่นๆเสมอเลยครับ
บางทีผมโหลดเสจ เพื่อนๆในทีมกำลัง ยึดธงแล้วก็มีครับ

spec i5;RAM 4gb; HIS 5770; win7 32bit ;net true 8mb/1mb

เล่นserver fragnetics [SG] ครับ ปืงประมาณ 150-180

[jajaboss]

ค่ายแดงก็งี้ อืดอาด

[Kingdomax]

dx 10 -11มันจะโหลดช้ากว่าdx9น้ะครับ

[sambaycup]

ครับ ของผม dx11

แล้ว dx11 ช้ากว่า dx10 ด้วยเปล้าครับ

[okumon]

อยากโหลดเร็วกว่าเก่าลองปรับไปเล่นแบบ Dx9 ดูครับ รู้สึกได้ว่าโหลดเร็วกว่าเก่า แต่คงไม่เร็วเท่า Nvidia ละมั้ง

[AnonymousX]

ลอง defrag hdd ดูด้วย, เป็นปัจจัยหนึ่ง

[ekmind]

HD5770 อย่าไปคิดมา drive ati มันโหลดเข้าเกมส์ช้าครับ คนใช้ ati เป็นกันเยอะ
ผมก็เป็น แย่งรถถังไม่ทันเลย

[sambaycup]

ถ้าเป็น 5870 จะไวขึ้นไหมครับ หรือเป็นทั้ง ATI เลย

[ekmind]

Ok, so it's not just me then. A buddy of mine has a Phenom x4 and 5870 on XP x64 and I have a Q9550 @ 3.5ghz and 5870 on Win7 x64 with a RAID0 drive setup and not once have I entered the game before him or even shortly after him.

Connecting to the same server (which only plays atacama desert, so load times are for the same map) this is what I get timed from when the load screen appear until I saw the new screen of the gameplay appear (in order of testing):
dx11 test1: 48seconds
dx9 test1: 23seconds
dx10 test1: 62 seconds
dx11 test2: 48seconds
dx10 test2: 61seconds
dx9 test2: 22seconds

Of course, a +/- 2second margin of error should be assumed because the loading screen fades in as does the gameplay screen, which seems to take 1 second for each fade in. I believe this is due to how my monitor adjusts brightness levels after the screen goes black, so I'm not necessarily starting/stopping at the same time each time. Whatever the case, that margin of error is well below the significant time differences I accrued with my stopwatch.

Using dx9 is not an option because of the horrid flickering inherent when using an ATI-based card and dx9. My 8800GS I was using last week (still on Win7 with nvidia) did not have the flickering on dx10 and I can't recall if I ever used dx9. I never timed the loading with nvidia because I expected longer with a current generation game and wasn't bothered, but once I switched to this ATI card and enabled dx11, I started thinking the game files had become corrupt because the load times seemed to be more than twice as long compared to my nvidia card. Nope, it's just ATI & dx11. I can assure everyone that my 8800GS using dx10 did not take one minute to load :/

This is likely to be a driver issue on ATI's end rather than a problem that DICE needs, or is even able, to fix. I've never owned an ATI card because of their history with crappy drivers and I was certain those days were over, but I seem to have been wrong. However, DICE certainly could lend ATI a hand since they have such an awesome dx11-based game with a huge fanbase.

So yeah, I don't think we need to point the finger at DICE here...but game developers are often the ones that go to the companies which created the drivers and bug them to fix the issues, so we can politely ask DICE to help out there =]

[chawin007]

ผมว่า เป็นที่ ATI แน่ๆ เลย

[Kingdomax]

Ok, so it's not just me then. A buddy of mine has a Phenom x4 and 5870 on XP x64 and I have a Q9550 @ 3.5ghz and 5870 on Win7 x64 with a RAID0 drive setup and not once have I entered the game before him or even shortly after him.

Connecting to the same server (which only plays atacama desert, so load times are for the same map) this is what I get timed from when the load screen appear until I saw the new screen of the gameplay appear (in order of testing):
dx11 test1: 48seconds
dx9 test1: 23seconds
dx10 test1: 62 seconds
dx11 test2: 48seconds
dx10 test2: 61seconds
dx9 test2: 22seconds

Of course, a +/- 2second margin of error should be assumed because the loading screen fades in as does the gameplay screen, which seems to take 1 second for each fade in. I believe this is due to how my monitor adjusts brightness levels after the screen goes black, so I'm not necessarily starting/stopping at the same time each time. Whatever the case, that margin of error is well below the significant time differences I accrued with my stopwatch.

Using dx9 is not an option because of the horrid flickering inherent when using an ATI-based card and dx9. My 8800GS I was using last week (still on Win7 with nvidia) did not have the flickering on dx10 and I can't recall if I ever used dx9. I never timed the loading with nvidia because I expected longer with a current generation game and wasn't bothered, but once I switched to this ATI card and enabled dx11, I started thinking the game files had become corrupt because the load times seemed to be more than twice as long compared to my nvidia card. Nope, it's just ATI & dx11. I can assure everyone that my 8800GS using dx10 did not take one minute to load :/

This is likely to be a driver issue on ATI's end rather than a problem that DICE needs, or is even able, to fix. I've never owned an ATI card because of their history with crappy drivers and I was certain those days were over, but I seem to have been wrong. However, DICE certainly could lend ATI a hand since they have such an awesome dx11-based game with a huge fanbase.

So yeah, I don't think we need to point the finger at DICE here...but game developers are often the ones that go to the companies which created the drivers and bug them to fix the issues, so we can politely ask DICE to help out there =]

ดอกเตอร์เลยทีเดียว!

[ekmind]

มันเป็นที่ ATI เลยครับ

การ์ดจอเก่าผม 8800GT ไม่ว่าจะใช้ dx9 หรือ 10 ก็โหลดเวลาพอ ๆ กัน
แต่ถ้าเป็น ati นี่คนละเรื่องเลย -*-

[BENZ_EMPEROR]

วางยาอีกป่าวหว่า- -

[Kingdomax]

มันเป็นที่ ATI เลยครับ

การ์ดจอเก่าผม 8800GT ไม่ว่าจะใช้ dx9 หรือ 10 ก็โหลดเวลาพอ ๆ กัน
แต่ถ้าเป็น ati นี่คนละเรื่องเลย -*-

ลุงเปลี่ยนการ์ดจอมาแล้วหรอครับ?

[Nobo]

ผมก็ ATi เหมือนกันช้าได้ใจ