Tweet
ทดสอบเมื่อวันที่ 15-09-2013
ชุดที่ทดสอบ
?Processors: ?AMD A10-6800K (Richland, 4 cores, 4.1-4.4 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 8670D);
?AMD A8-6600K (Richland, 4 cores, 3.9-4.2 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 8570D);
?AMD A6-6400K (Richland, 2 cores, 3.9-4.1 GHz, 1 MB L2, Radeon HD 8470D);
?AMD A10-5800K (Trinity, 4 cores, 3.8-4.2 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 7660D);
?AMD A8-5600K (Trinity, 4 cores, 3.6-3.9 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 7560D);
?AMD A6-5400K (Trinity, 2 cores, 3.6-3.8 GHz, 1 MB L2, Radeon HD 7540D);
?Intel Core i5-4430 (Haswell, 4 cores, 3.0-3.2 GHz, 6 MB L3, HD Graphics 4600);
?Intel Core i3-3240 (Ivy Bridge, 2 cores + HT, 3.4 GHz, 3 MB L3, HD Graphics 2500);
?Intel Core i3-3225 (Ivy Bridge, 2 cores + HT, 3.3 GHz, 3 MB L3, HD Graphics 4000).
?Processor cooler: NZXT Havik 140.
?Mainboards: ?ASUS Crosshair V Formula (Socket AM3+, AMD 990FX + SB950);
?ASUS F2A85-V Pro (Socket FM2, AMD A85);
?ASUS P8Z77-V LX (LGA1155, Intel Z77 Express);
?Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H (LGA 1150, Intel Z87 Express).
?Graphics cards: ?Gigabyte GeForce GT 640 (GV-N640D3-2GI, 2 GB/128-bit DDR3, 900/1800 MHz);
?Sapphire Radeon HD 7750 (11202-13, 2 GB/128-bit DDR3, 800/1600 MHz).
?Memory: 2 x 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM (G.Skill [TridentX] F3-2133C9D-16GTX).
?Storage subsystem: Crucial m4 256 GB (CT256M4SSD2).
?Power supply unit: Corsair AX760i (80 Plus Platinum, 760 W).
?Operating system: Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise x64.
?Drivers: ?AMD Catalyst 13.6 Beta Driver;
?AMD Chipset Driver 13.4;
?Intel Chipset Driver 9.4.0.1017;
?Intel HD Graphics Driver 15.31.3.64.3165;
?Intel Management Engine Driver 9.5.0.1345;
?Intel Rapid Storage Technology 12.5.0.1066;
?NVIDIA GeForce 320.49 Driver.
Here I would like to add that NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 were tested in a platform based on AMD A10-6800K processor
3D Performance
As a tentative test of the 3D performance of the graphics cores integrated into the Trinity and Ivy Bridge processors, we will run Futuremark 3DMark. Its Cloud Gate test is designed to benchmark DirectX 10 performance of typical home PCs whereas the most resource-consuming Fire Strike is targeted at gaming DirectX 11-compatible configurations.
AMD Dual Graphics Performance
Multimedia Engine Performance
The next diagram shows the load on the processors? x86 cores.
Video transcoding is yet another popular video-processing load. To test the related hardware technologies, we use CyberLink MediaEspresso 6.7 which supports both Intel?s Quick Sync and AMD?s VCE. The test consists of transcoding a 1.5GB 1080p video clip in H.264 format (a 20-minute episode of a popular TV series) into a lower-resolution version for watching on an iPhone 4S. So, the target format was H.264, 1280x768 pixels with a bitrate of about 6 Mbps.
Every time we talk about video transcoding technologies implemented in today?s graphics hardware, and especially about Intel Quick Sync, we have to admit that they are largely supported by not-very-popular commercial utilities. This situation is about to change, though. For example, QuickSync and OpenCL have been introduced into a beta version of the free software tool HandBrake. Let?s see what performance we can expected from the tested graphics cores if we use HandBrake for our transcoding.
Power Consumption
ชุดที่ทดสอบ
?Processors: ?AMD A10-6800K (Richland, 4 cores, 4.1-4.4 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 8670D);
?AMD A8-6600K (Richland, 4 cores, 3.9-4.2 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 8570D);
?AMD A6-6400K (Richland, 2 cores, 3.9-4.1 GHz, 1 MB L2, Radeon HD 8470D);
?AMD A10-5800K (Trinity, 4 cores, 3.8-4.2 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 7660D);
?AMD A8-5600K (Trinity, 4 cores, 3.6-3.9 GHz, 4 MB L2, Radeon HD 7560D);
?AMD A6-5400K (Trinity, 2 cores, 3.6-3.8 GHz, 1 MB L2, Radeon HD 7540D);
?Intel Core i5-4430 (Haswell, 4 cores, 3.0-3.2 GHz, 6 MB L3, HD Graphics 4600);
?Intel Core i3-3240 (Ivy Bridge, 2 cores + HT, 3.4 GHz, 3 MB L3, HD Graphics 2500);
?Intel Core i3-3225 (Ivy Bridge, 2 cores + HT, 3.3 GHz, 3 MB L3, HD Graphics 4000).
?Processor cooler: NZXT Havik 140.
?Mainboards: ?ASUS Crosshair V Formula (Socket AM3+, AMD 990FX + SB950);
?ASUS F2A85-V Pro (Socket FM2, AMD A85);
?ASUS P8Z77-V LX (LGA1155, Intel Z77 Express);
?Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H (LGA 1150, Intel Z87 Express).
?Graphics cards: ?Gigabyte GeForce GT 640 (GV-N640D3-2GI, 2 GB/128-bit DDR3, 900/1800 MHz);
?Sapphire Radeon HD 7750 (11202-13, 2 GB/128-bit DDR3, 800/1600 MHz).
?Memory: 2 x 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM (G.Skill [TridentX] F3-2133C9D-16GTX).
?Storage subsystem: Crucial m4 256 GB (CT256M4SSD2).
?Power supply unit: Corsair AX760i (80 Plus Platinum, 760 W).
?Operating system: Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise x64.
?Drivers: ?AMD Catalyst 13.6 Beta Driver;
?AMD Chipset Driver 13.4;
?Intel Chipset Driver 9.4.0.1017;
?Intel HD Graphics Driver 15.31.3.64.3165;
?Intel Management Engine Driver 9.5.0.1345;
?Intel Rapid Storage Technology 12.5.0.1066;
?NVIDIA GeForce 320.49 Driver.
Here I would like to add that NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 were tested in a platform based on AMD A10-6800K processor
3D Performance
As a tentative test of the 3D performance of the graphics cores integrated into the Trinity and Ivy Bridge processors, we will run Futuremark 3DMark. Its Cloud Gate test is designed to benchmark DirectX 10 performance of typical home PCs whereas the most resource-consuming Fire Strike is targeted at gaming DirectX 11-compatible configurations.
AMD Dual Graphics Performance
Multimedia Engine Performance
The next diagram shows the load on the processors? x86 cores.
Video transcoding is yet another popular video-processing load. To test the related hardware technologies, we use CyberLink MediaEspresso 6.7 which supports both Intel?s Quick Sync and AMD?s VCE. The test consists of transcoding a 1.5GB 1080p video clip in H.264 format (a 20-minute episode of a popular TV series) into a lower-resolution version for watching on an iPhone 4S. So, the target format was H.264, 1280x768 pixels with a bitrate of about 6 Mbps.
Every time we talk about video transcoding technologies implemented in today?s graphics hardware, and especially about Intel Quick Sync, we have to admit that they are largely supported by not-very-popular commercial utilities. This situation is about to change, though. For example, QuickSync and OpenCL have been introduced into a beta version of the free software tool HandBrake. Let?s see what performance we can expected from the tested graphics cores if we use HandBrake for our transcoding.
Power Consumption
Comment